Charles Whitford is seeking an apology after being cleared of misconduct. This follows a report that identified a ‘technical breach’ of the councillors’ code of conduct.
The investigation found no evidence of financial gain related to Whitford’s actions. Consequently, it recommended no further action against him.
In a related case, Joe Harris, a former council leader, was also cleared of misconduct. A complaint had been lodged against him, but the council’s monitoring officer found no breach of the code.
Harris is now requesting an apology from the council. He stated, “I believe it is now appropriate for the council to acknowledge that the implication arising from the counter fraud report was incorrect and to apologise for the impact this has had on me and my reputation.”
The report regarding Whitford indicated that he believed the company involved had been dissolved. This situation underscores how online rumors can tarnish reputations.
Monitoring officer Hazel Best noted an increase in complaints about councillors’ social media use. She stated, “Unwise comments on social media can have an adverse impact both on the member’s and the council’s reputation.”
Complaints against Worcestershire county councillors for social media use have risen significantly. This prompted new guidance advising councillors against making potentially embarrassing online comments.
The outcome of these independent investigations shows that no undeclared interests existed in Harris’s case. However, both he and Whitford are calling for accountability from their respective councils.
No timeline has been shared regarding when any apologies might be issued. Observers are closely watching how Cotswold District Council will respond to these requests.